Intellectual Property Lawyers | Protecting Media & Entertainment Rights

Award Winning Internet Solicitor Blog

Resource library

In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, staying informed and increasing knowledge in specialised legal services is crucial for e-commerce and digital technology businesses. At PAIL® Solicitors, we understand the unique challenges faced by start-ups, medium-sized companies, and creative agencies in protecting their intellectual property and navigating legal complexities. By focusing on continuous learning and expertise in these areas, businesses can safeguard their reputation, make informed financial decisions, and seamlessly expand into new markets with confidence.

Our blog is dedicated to providing valuable insights and updates on legal trends affecting e-commerce, social media channels, and digital design industries. With PAIL® Solicitors, you'll gain access to expert advice on mitigating risks, understanding potential legal barriers, and ensuring compliance when hiring international contractors or employees. By staying engaged with our content, your business will be better equipped to handle legal challenges, save time and money, and thrive in the competitive digital marketplace.

Television broadcast copyright infringement

 

Television broadcast copyright infringement

UK High Court awards injunctions and damages for television broadcast copyright infringement
 

High Court of Justice, Chancery division, Intellectual property
 
Before: Mr Justice Birss
 
Between:
 
Claimants
 
(1) British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc

(2) British Sky Broadcasting Group Ltd

(3) Sky Subscriber Service Ltd
 
and
 
Defendants
 
(1) Christopher John Duarte (trading as Crispin Inn)

(2) Elizabeth Mary Polding (trading as Eccleston Arms)

(3) Gloria J. Allen (trading as Lettered Board)

(4) Royston Paulk Kift (trading as Plough and Harrow Inn)

Judgement Date: 15th January 2014
 
Facts
 
The claimants successfully brought a number of actions for damages and injunctions in the Patent County Court against licensees who have been showing Sky Sports without a commercial viewing agreement.