Expert IP, Digital Media & Commercial Contracts Solicitor
Authorised international solicitors in IP, media & commerce. Experts in contracts, licensing, reputation & disputes.
PAIL-Solicitors-Digital-Media-Solicitors-Blog.png

Digital Media, IP & Technology Law Insights

Legal analysis for founders, creators, technology businesses and brands across intellectual property, digital media, AI, platforms and commercial law.

PAIL Solicitors digital media, intellectual property and technology law insights
PAIL® INSIGHTS Ideas · Rights · Technology · Commercial Strategy
The Idea Behind PAIL® Insights

Why “My Way”?

Frank Sinatra’s My Way captures something fundamental about intellectual property: the distinction between an idea and the individual expression of it.

Copyright does not give someone ownership of an idea itself, but it can protect the particular way that idea is expressed through music, literature, art and other creative works.

That principle of creating, building and expressing something your way sits at the heart of this blog. PAIL® Insights explores the legal issues that arise when creativity, technology and commerce meet — and the rights, relationships and decisions that determine who can control and benefit from what has been created.

About the Blog

Practical Legal Insight for a Digital World

PAIL® Insights brings together legal analysis, practical guidance and commentary across intellectual property, digital media, AI and technology, creators and talent, reputation, platforms and commercial law.

The articles are written for founders, businesses, creators and professionals who need to understand not only what the law says, but how legal developments affect ownership, commercialisation, contracts, risk and growth.

Every article is written, reviewed or edited by Peter Adediran, Founder Solicitor at PAIL® Solicitors.

Written & Reviewed By Peter Adediran Founder Solicitor · Intellectual Property · Digital Media · Technology · Commercial Law
About Peter →

Discover Insights:

Song writing credits copyright splits?

 

Song writing credits copyright splits?

Song writing credits copyright splits where recently clarified by the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in the Touch Sensitive Case. About a month ago, on the 20 May 2015, Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels sitting as deputy enterprise judge at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court handed down judgment in yet another dispute issued in the IPEC regarding song writing credits and royalty splits. The case is called (1) Minder Music Limited (2) Julia Adamson -and- Steven Sharples [2015] EWHC 1454 Minder Music Limited was the first claimant, Julia Adamson the second and Steven Sharples the defendant.

In brief, the case concerned a dispute over the defendant’s rights, if any, to the song “Touch Sensitive” recorded by “The Fall” in 1999 featuring Mark Smith (MS) on vocals, and released by Artful Records on “The Marshall Suite” album in the same year. Julia Adamson (JA) composed the original music of the song. Steven Sharples (SS) produced the album containing the song “The Marshall Suite”.

The full facts were as follows.

In 1998 MS and JA wrote the original song “Touch Sensitive” together. MS wrote the lyrics and JA the music. MS assigned his performance/publishing rights in the original version of the song to Minder Music Limited (MML). MS, MML and JA agreed a rights split of 33.34% to MS for the lyrics and 66.66% to JA for the music. There were subsequently different versions of the original song as the band sought to create a more fully orchestrated composition.

In 1999 the band agreed to release an album through Artful Records Limited and this is when SS stepped in as a producer. SS knew his stuff as a producer, he was a musician and composer with his own recording studio. Producers are paid to create the vision for the label to create and improved sound.

According to SS he was approached by Bernard McMahon who he alleged was the band manager to produce the recorded version of the song for the album. He alleged that he had an agreement with McMahon that he would have a one-third interest in the song along with JA and MS. All this was denied by JA and MML. In any event, the album was released with the following credits – MS, JA and SS writers of the album version; SS as the sole or joint author of other tracks on the album. MS was credited for vocal, keyboard and guitar, JA for keyboards, guitar and programming and SS for string arrangements. SS was credited for production along with MS and McMahon as associate producer and Lennard who owned Artful Records as executive producer.

SS tried to register his interest with PRS in the album version in 1999. In 2005 PRS put ownership of the album version of the song into dispute as a result of a claim by SS’s publishing company Universal. In light of the dispute PRS suspended royalty payments.

In 2011 JA entered into an agreement with SS dated 13 August 2013 to settle the matter. It provided that the album version should be registered with PRS in the following shares: MS 33.34%, JA 33.33% and SS 33.33%.

MML however were not happy with that and applied in 2014 joining JA as the second claimant claiming that MML owned 33.34% and JA owned 66.66% and other relief.

The matters interesting to musicians, producers and lawyers about this case are:

  1. Apparently credits on albums can be misleading.

  2. There are potential dangers when the parties themselves try to manage the evidence. MML did not instruct solicitors. There were issues about the difference between various recorded versions of the song. Expert evidence from Peter Oxendale had been adduced in an “unusual” way.

  3. The significant contribution test set by Deputy Judge Williamson QC in Bangboye v Reed and what the share of royalties should be in such cases was followed.

  4. Are settlement agreements of the sort entered into between JA and SS unconscionable?

The recorder concluded that SS (the D) had made a small contribution to the album version of the song. A 20% share would properly reflect the Ds share in the copyright in the music in the album version.

If you like this article on song writing credits and copyright splits you might like our articles on:

Copyright infringement on You Tube

digital media lawyers

digital technology lawyers

To obtain a quotation, please contact us at (020) 7305-7491 or at peter@pailsolicitors.co.uk. We would be delighted to assist you. Mr Peter Adediran is the owner and principal solicitor at PAIL® Solicitors.  Subscribe to our newsletter to get blog post updates and other information about the firm straight to your inbox.